References

This work is based on existing literature related to scientific communication:

Abraham, G. (2020). The importance of science communication. Metallography, Microstructure, and Analysis, 9(1), 3-4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13632-020-00613-w

Akin, H. & Landrum, A.R. (2017). A recap: Heuristics, biases, values, and other challenges to communicating science. In K. H. Jamieson, D. M. Kahan & D. Scheufele (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on the Science of Science Communication (pp. 455-460). Oxford University Press.

Auch, A. (2018). Hype, argumentation, and scientific dissemination. In P. Vasterman (ed.), From media hype to twitter storm. News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion (pp. 115-129). Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21215m0.9

Boydstun, A. E., Hardy, A., & Walgrave, S. (2014). Two faces of media attention: Media storm versus non-storm coverage. Political Communication, 31(4), 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.875967

Brown, N. (2003) Hope against hype. Accountability in biopasts, presents and futures. Science Studies, 16(2), 3-21.

Brown, N & Michael, M. (2003) A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024

Canfield, K.N., Menezes, S., Matsuda, S.B., Moore, A., Mosley Austin, A.N., Dewsbury, B.M., Feliú-Mójer, M.I., McDuffie, K.W.B., Moore, K., Reich, C.A., Smith, H.M., & Taylor, C (2020). Science communication demands a critical approach that centers inclusion, equity, and intersectionality. Frontiers of Communication, 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1080/0953732032000046024

Caulfield, T., & Condit, C. (2012). Science and the sources of hype. Public Health Genomics, 15, 209-217. https://doi.org/10.1159/000336533

Djerf-Pierre, M. (2012). When attention drives attention: Issue dynamics in environmental news reporting over five decades. European Journal of Communication, 27(3), 291-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323112450820

Dubin, J. M., Greer, A. B., Patel, P., Carrion, D. M., Paesano, N., Kettache, R. H., ... & Rivas, J. G. (2021). Global survey of the roles and attitudes toward social media platforms amongst urology trainees. Urology, 147, 64-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.09.007.

Duh, H. I., & Dabula, N. (2021). Millennials' socio-psychology and blood donation intention developed from social media communications: A survey of university students. Telematics and Informatics, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101534

Evans, J.P., Meslin, E.M., Marteau, T.M., & Caulfield, T. (2011). Deflating the genomic bubble. Science, 331(6019), 861-862.

Fischhoff, B. (2019). Evaluating science communication. PNAS, 116(16), 7670-7675. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805863115

Geiß, S. (2010). The shape of news waves. How the intensity of coverage of news events develops over time'. In Paper for the conference of the Association for Public Opinion Research (WAPOR) in Chicago. Mainz: Johannes Gutenberg-Universität.

Gray, J. (2008). Television pre-views and the meaning of hype. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11(1), 33-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877907086391

Gray, J. (2010a). Texts that sell: The culture in promotional culture. In M. Aronczyk & D. Powers (Eds.), Blowing up the brand: Critical perspectives on promotional culture (pp. 307-325). Peter Lang Press.

Gray, J. (2010b). Show sold separately: Promos, spoilers, and other media paratexts. NYU Press.

Hellsten, I., & Nerlich, B. (2010). Bird flu hype: The spread of disease outbreak through the media and Internet discussion groups. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(3), 393-408. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.9.3.03hel

Hopf, H., Matlin, S.A., Mehta, G., & Krief, A. (2020). Blocking the hype-hypocrisy-falsification-fakery pathway is needed to safeguard science. Angewandte Chemie, 59, 2150 - 2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201911889

Ivanova, A., Schäfer, M.S., Schlichting, I., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Is there a medialization of climate science? Results from a survey of German climate scientists. Science Communication, 35(5). 626-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012475226

Jensen, E.A., & Gerber, A. (2020). Evidence-based science communication. Frontiers in Communication, 4(78). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00078

Jensen, E., &Holliman, R. (2016). Norms and values in UK science engagement practice. International Journal of Science Education, 6, 68-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2014.995743

Kuruvilla, D. E., Mehta, A., Ravishankar, N., & Cowan, R. P. (2021). A patient perspective of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) for migraine treatment: a social media survey. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, 21(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-021-03226-0

Lackie, M. E., Parrilla, J. S., Lavery, B. M., Kennedy, A. L., Ryan, D., Shulman, B., & Brotto, L. A. (2021). Digital health needs of women with postpartum depression: Focus Group Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/18934

Marcinkowski, F., Kohring, M., Fürst, S., & Friedrichsmeier, A. (2014). Organizational influence on scientists' efforts to go public: An empirical investigation. Science Communication, 36(1). 56-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013494022

Metag, J. (2017). Rezeption und Wirkung öffentlicher Wissenschaftskommunikation [Reception and effect of public science communication]. In H. Bonfadelli, B. Fähnrich, C. Lüthje, J. Milde, M. Rhomberg & M. Schäfer (eds.), Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation (pp. 251-274). Springer VS.

Nerlich B and McLeod C (2016) The dilemma of raising awareness 'responsibly'. EMBO Reports 17: 481-485. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541853

Nisbet, M. C. & Markowitz, E. (eds.) (2016). Science communication research: Bridging theory and practice. American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Paimre, M. & Harro-Loit, H. (2011). Media generated news waves catalysts for discursive change: The case study on drug issues in Estonian print media. Journalism, 12(4), 433-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388226

Peters, H. P., Brossard, B., de Cheveigné, S., Dunwoody, S., Heinrichs, H., Jung, A., Kallfass, M., Miller, S., Petersen, I., Tsuchida, S., Cain, A., & Paquez. A.S. (2009). Medialisierung der Wissenschaft und ihre Relevanz für das Verhältnis zur Politik [Medialization of science and its relevance to the relationship to politics]. In H.P. Peters (ed.), Medienorientierung biomedizinischer Forscher im internationalen Vergleich. Die Schnittstelle von Wissenschaft und Journalismus und ihre politische Relevanz (pp. 9-43). Forschungszentrum Jülich.

Powers, D. (2012). Notes on Hype. International Journal of Communication, 6, 857-873.

Roberson, T.M. (2020). Can hype be a force for good?: Inviting unexpected engagement with science and technology futures. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520923109

Roberson, T.M. (2019). Can hype be a force for good? PhD Dissertation. Australian National University.

Ruigrok, N., Scholten, O., Krijt, M., & Schaper, J. (2009). Fitna and the media: A source-oriented media hype. Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap, 37(3), 238-253.

Schäfer, M.S., Kessler, S.H., & Fähnrich, B. (2020). Analyzing science communication through the lens of communication science: Reviewing the empirical evidence. In A. Leßmöllmann, M. Dascal, & T. Gloning (eds.), Science Communication (pp. 77-104). De Gruyter.

Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398-405. https://doi-org.libproxy1.nus.edu.sg/10.1111/nhs.12048

Van Atteveldt, W., Rugrok, N., Wellbers, K., & Jacobi, C. (2018). News waves in a changing media landscape 1950-2014. In P. Vasterman (ed.), From media hype to twitter storm. News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion (pp. 61-82). Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt21215m0.7

Vasterman, P. (2018). Introduction. In P. Vasterman (ed.), From media hype to twitter storm. News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion (pp. 17-35). Amsterdam University Press. DOI: 10.5117/9789462982178/intro

Vasterman, P. (ed). (2018). From media hype to twitter storm. News explosions and their impact on issues, crises and public opinion. Amsterdam University Press.

Vasterman, P. (2005). Media-hype. Self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards and the construction of social problems. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 508-530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323105058254

Vasterman, Peter (2004). Mediahype. Amsterdam: Aksant.

Wien, C. & Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2009). An anatomy of media hypes: Developing a model for the dynamics and structure of intense media coverage of single issues. European Journal of Communication, 24(2), 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323108101831

Williams, R., Jack, C., Gamboa, D., & Shackley, S. (2021). Decarbonising steel production using CO2 capture and storage (CCS): Results of focus group discussions in a welsh steel-making community. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2020.103218